What is priority setting in nursing

Barry University Priority Setting For Nurses Case Study
Subject
Health Medical

School
Barry University

Question Description
Priority setting for Nurses case study paper. Which patient should the nurse see first.Assignment: ATI Video Case Study Paper Watch the ATI video case study Priority Setting and respond to the following: If you were the nurse in this situation, which client should you see first? Identify the priority framework you are using and the rationale for your selection. • • • • Your paper should be 2 pages You are required to use and cite one academic source. Use current APA Style. Include a title page and a reference page listing the source(s) you used. Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded. Paper Rubric Exit • • Grid View List View Sophisticated Highly Competent Fairly Competent Unsatisfac Content Points Range:45 (45.00%) 50 (50.00%) The response fully addresses all elements of the writing prompt. The response provides detail and/or quality examples, demonstrating a depth of understanding. Points Range:40 (40.00%) 44.5 (44.50%) The response addresses all elements of the writing prompt, but one or two may be vague or incomplete. Most details or examples support the prompt very well, demonstrating a strong understanding. Points Range:36.5 (36.50%) 39.5 (39.50%) Multiple components of the prompt are not addressed. Details and examples may be missing in more than two occasions, demonstrating some understanding. Points Range:0 (0 36 (36.00% The respo inaccurate unrelated t prompt an componen prompt are addressed are no det examples. Organization Points Range:40.5 (40.50%) 45 (45.00%) There is a sophisticated, concise introduction, body, and conclusion Points Range:36 (36.00%) 40.05 (40.05%) There is a wellwritten introduction, body and conclusion to the paper. The Points Range:32.85 (32.85%) 35.55 (35.55%) There is an obvious introduction, body, and conclusion to the paper, but there may Points Range:0 (0 32.4 (32.40 There is no introductio conclusion paper doe Mechanics and APA Format Sophisticated Highly Competent Fairly Competent Unsatisfac to the paper. The introduction provides an overview of the topic. The information in the body is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion summarizes the topic and includes the writer's thoughts on the subject. introduction provides a general overview of the topic, but may be incomplete or wordy. The information in the body is mostly relevant and mostly presented in a logical order with one or two exceptions. The conclusion summarizes the topic, but may somewhat be brief or abrupt. be a few instances that are off topic or vague. The information in the body is generally relevant, but not concise. Much of the information is not presented in a clear, logical order. The conclusion may be incomplete, or slightly off-topic. follow the format. Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) 5 (5.00%) The paper is written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. The paper is error free. Information from sources is appropriately paraphrased and accurately referenced and cited in APA when applicable. The paper meets assignment length requirements. Points Range:4 (4.00%) 4.45 (4.45%) Most of the writing is clear and organized, but there may be one or two instances where it is not concise or formal in language. Minor errors exist in spelling and grammar with no interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly. The paper meets assignment length requirements. Points Range:3.65 (3.65%) 3.95 (3.95%) In three or more instances, the writing is unclear and unorganized. Several errors in spelling and grammar somewhat interfere with readability. Information from a few sources is missing or improperly cited. The paper does not fully meet assignment length requirements. Points Range:0 (0 3.6 (3.60% Mechanica significantl with the re the paper. attempt to required fo indicated. does not c to meeting assignmen requireme Assignment: Case Study Paper Nurses make clinical decisions on a daily basis, and unless they base those decisions on appropriate, evidence-based, priority framework, they may compromise expected client outcomes. NURSE #1 is giving report to the upcoming shift nurse. Nancy Jones, in room 6310, has an infiltrated IV line. We were unable to start a new IV, and her ampicillin is due at 8:00 a.m. Justin Foster, in room 6314, called for pain medication at 7:00 a.m., so that still needs to be given. Anna chen, in 6315, is diagnosed with gastritis and called for assistance to the restroom. I’ve contacted assistive personnel and let them know this. Lenny Williams, in room 6307, contacted Laura, the assistive personnel, stating that he’s experience pain in his right calf, and Laura stated that his calf was red. NARRATOR: This nurse is receiving valuable information she needs to care for her assigned clients. She is making decisions about what to do. Respond to the challenge If you were the nurse in this situation, which client should you see first? Identify the priority framework you are using and the rationale for your selection. case study Priority Setting and respond to the following: If you were the nurse in this situation, which client should you see first? Identify the priority framework you are using and the rationale for your selection. • • • • Your paper should be 2 pages You are required to use and cite one academic source. Use current APA Style. Include a title page and a reference page listing the source(s) you used. Paper Rubric Exit • • Grid View List View Sophisticated Highly Competent Fairly Competent Unsatisfac Content Points Range:45 (45.00%) 50 (50.00%) The response fully addresses all elements of the writing prompt. The response provides detail and/or quality examples, demonstrating a depth of understanding. Points Range:40 (40.00%) 44.5 (44.50%) The response addresses all elements of the writing prompt, but one or two may be vague or incomplete. Most details or examples support the prompt very well, demonstrating a strong understanding. Points Range:36.5 (36.50%) 39.5 (39.50%) Multiple components of the prompt are not addressed. Details and examples may be missing in more than two occasions, demonstrating some understanding. Points Range:0 (0 36 (36.00% The respo inaccurate unrelated t prompt an componen prompt are addressed are no det examples. Organization Points Range:40.5 (40.50%) 45 (45.00%) There is a sophisticated, concise introduction, body, and conclusion to the paper. The introduction provides an overview of the topic. The information in the body is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion summarizes the topic and includes the Points Range:36 (36.00%) 40.05 (40.05%) There is a wellwritten introduction, body and conclusion to the paper. The introduction provides a general overview of the topic, but may be incomplete or wordy. The information in the body is mostly relevant and mostly presented in a logical order with one or two exceptions. The Points Range:32.85 (32.85%) 35.55 (35.55%) There is an obvious introduction, body, and conclusion to the paper, but there may be a few instances that are off topic or vague. The information in the body is generally relevant, but not concise. Much of the information is not presented in a clear, logical order. The conclusion may be Points Range:0 (0 32.4 (32.40 There is no introductio conclusion paper doe follow the format. Mechanics and APA Format Sophisticated Highly Competent Fairly Competent writer's thoughts on the subject. conclusion summarizes the topic, but may somewhat be brief or abrupt. incomplete, or slightly off-topic. Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) 5 (5.00%) The paper is written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. The paper is error free. Information from sources is appropriately paraphrased and accurately referenced and cited in APA when applicable. The paper meets assignment length requirements. Points Range:4 (4.00%) 4.45 (4.45%) Most of the writing is clear and organized, but there may be one or two instances where it is not concise or formal in language. Minor errors exist in spelling and grammar with no interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly. The paper meets assignment length requirements. Points Range:3.65 (3.65%) 3.95 (3.95%) In three or more instances, the writing is unclear and unorganized. Several errors in spelling and grammar somewhat interfere with readability. Information from a few sources is missing or improperly cited. The paper does not fully meet assignment length requirements. Unsatisfac Points Range:0 (0 3.6 (3.60% Mechanica significantl with the re the paper. attempt to required fo indicated. does not c to meeting assignmen requireme ...