Www stress org holmes rahe stress inventory

Mental Health

Please complete the Holmes-Raye Life Stress Inventory and Perceived Stress Questionnaire either yourself or administer it to an anonymous person in order to evaluate the results. Then write a 700-750-word recommendation on recognition of stressors and how to manage or adjust to life's challenges based on the results.

Holmes-Raye Life Stress Inventory

https://www.stress.org/holmes-rahe-stress-inventory/

or http://www.compassionfatigue.org
Perceived Stress Questionnaire

http://www.mindgarden.com/132-perceived-stress-scale#horizontalTab3

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the attached rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
MHW-501 MHW-501-O501 Responding to Stress Essay 60.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Recognition of Stressors 30.0% The evaluation does not include ways to recognize stressors or does not connect these with the results. The evaluation includes vague ways to recognize stressors and minimally connects these with the results. The evaluation includes ways to recognize stressors and connects these with the results. The evaluation includes ways to recognize multiple stressors and closely connects these with the results. The evaluation includes comprehensive ways to recognize multiple stressors and intrinsically connects these with the desired or recommended results.
Adjustments to Challenges 40.0% Recommendations for how to make adjustments to challenges are missing or unconnected to the results. Recommendations for how to make adjustments to challenges are vague or minimally connect to the results. Recommendations for how to make adjustments to challenges are effective options and connect to the results. Recommendations for how to make adjustments to challenges are multiple, effective, and connect to the results. Recommendations for how to make adjustments to challenges are comprehensive, effective, and intrinsically connect to the desired or recommended results.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%