Ethics on the job pfeiffer

RESOLVEDD Strategy Analysis

1. A brief and concise exposition of the basic story, facts and circumstances.

2. Identification of the problems or dilemmas of the case.

3. Discussion of solutions, both those used in the case and other options that reflect course content, e.g, laws, concepts and definitions.

4. Critique of solutions and consequences and benefits of actions taken.

Presentation Evaluation

1. Basic Story - Good overview, outline, aroused interest with audience, established credibility, explained basic facts of the case.

2. Problems and Dilemmas - Problem(s) identified clearly, explained why problem existed, dilemmas facing actors in case presented with balance and understandability. Cite legal sources or otherwise that contradict the ethics found in the case.

3. Solutions - Solutions enacted by case actors described, optional solutions presented

4. Critiques - Impact of solutions, critique of actions taken, consequences of acting or not acting

5. Delivery Style - Well paced, smooth flow, natural & easy use of notes, projected energy, volume & pitch, posture, professional

6. Organization - Material presented in logical order, continuity of subject matter, focused, timing, appropriate level for audience

7. Questions & Answers - Properly handled, able to respond appropriately, concise and direct, complete, appropriate

8. Conclusion - Repeated key points, summarized presentation, brief, strong

This assignment is an opportunity to demonstrate your grasp of the business ethics concepts to date. Your grade will reflect your level of detail and work. Your paper should be fraught with Legal, Biblical, Moral and Ethical terms. Use the above guidance and you will be on the right track.

Using the RESOLVEDD method of analysis, choose from either of the following cases found in chapter 6 to evaluate: (1) Affirmative Action and Company Promotion Policy, (2) Too Personal To Ask, or (3) Office Gossip. In that in addition to a properly APA formatted cover page, abstract and references, you must apply the RESOLVEDD analysis format. Each component of the RESOLVEDD methodology should be addressed with a separate and clear paragraph headings. Use the format specified in the readings.

Business Ethics Homework

Name

Institution

BUSINESS ETHICS HOMEWORK !2

Business Ethics Homework

Various values and standards guide the manner in which people lead their lives and

interact with others in the society. These rules of life are bound to evolve and change over time

as a person continues to gain more knowledge and many experiences in life, which helps change

the way in which they perceive the reality of the world around them. The life of human beings is

based on ethics, which makes him or her a rational being since their actions are justified through

the evaluation, comparison, and judgment of the situations, which is the used to justify the course

of action that is adopted by an individual (Pfeiffer & Forsberg, 2012). Thus, one must be guided

by the values and principles which are needed to make effective decisions within the

organization and for their personal improvement. Making the wrong decision could affect the

future progress of the firm and the people who depend on the organization. The RESOLVED

method provides a way of analyzing and understanding various ethical issues in business and

identifies the best approaches to resolving these issues.

RESOLVEDD Method in the Decision Making Process

R- Reviewing the Facts of the Case

History

The family practice business owned by Dr. Smith had been in operation for the past few

years. Saul, his younger brother, owned an accounting firm before he sold it to come and work

with Dr. Smith in the family practice business at his hometown of Zoar, Ohio. His role at the

business was to help his brother monitor any accounting errors and details while dealing with the

patient records.

Background

BUSINESS ETHICS HOMEWORK !3

While going through and sorting the patient records and business paperwork, Saul

noticed that there were errors in charging for Medicaid at the family practice business to the

patients. The Medicaid program is aimed at assisting the low-income households to access

quality health care services, without requiring them to make payments using cash or checks. Saul

notices that the Medicaid charges have been increasing over the years while the patients

continued to make cash payments for the services they received (Pfeiffer & Forsberg, 2012).

E-Estimate the Conflict

Dr. Smith has helped the people in his hometown to access medical care, which has

gained him a positive reputation in the community. However, after the evaluation of the

paperwork and patient records, Saul Discovers that more the $75,000 has been charged through

Medicaid, even though the patients had made cash payments for the services they received.

These charges are applied to all individuals regardless of their income level. This causes Saul to

confront Dr. Smith seeking clarification on how these errors had occurred.

S- Possible Solutions

In handling the situation, Saul should talk to Dr. Smith to convince him on the need to

report the case to Medicaid. This would help them avoid the possible challenges that may arise

when these fraudulent actions are discovered, among them being sent to jail for the two of them.

In case Dr. Smith does not accept the proposed solution, he should make a move to report

the incident to Medicaid, as this would help them to avoid being involved in cases of fraud. Even

though this may compromise the situation of his brother, it would ensure that the necessary

actions are taken to protect the people and improve the quality of medical care to the people in

the town (Carroll, & Buchholtz, 2014).

BUSINESS ETHICS HOMEWORK !4

The other alternative solution would be for Saul to avoid reporting the incident and

assume that he had not discovered the errors in the patient records all along. Even though this

may accrue as malpractice in his profession, it would save his brother’s service and enable him to

avoid losing his job (Lashley, 2016). However, if such an act is discovered, more consequences

may accrue such as the closure of the family practice business and termination of his license.

O – Important and Likely Outcomes

By reporting the incident, the hospital may be closed due to misappropriation of medical

funds and exploitation of the patients. Reporting the case may offer the doctor a chance to make

the necessary payments to ensure that the money he had fraudulently acquired is paid pack to

Medicaid. In addition, Saul is bound to lose his job and license once the incident is discovered, if

h opts not to report it (Carroll, & Buchholtz, 2014).

L –Likely Impact of the Solution

The malpractice may lead to the closure of the family care business, which could affect

the people of the town, who depend on it for their healthcare needs (Pfeiffer & Forsberg, 2012).

In addition, Dr. Smith may be jailed for his actions in as much as the accountant; Saul is likely to

have his license canceled and risk a jail term for the accounting malpractices. If the case is not

reported, and the patients continue being charged the same way, Medicaid could continue losing

more money.

V – Values Upheld by Each Solution

Reporting the case portrays the honesty, reliability and acting responsibly by the doctor

and the accountant, who may have been unaware of the errors that were taking place, as they had

not looked into the details of the patient records. Saul portrays values of accountability,

BUSINESS ETHICS HOMEWORK !5

responsibility, and competence by identifying these errors and reporting them to the relevant

authorities for actions to be taken. However, failing to report indicates irresponsibility, lack of

professionalism, and dishonesty as the customers may continue to be exploited by these actions

(Pfeiffer & Forsberg, 2012).

E- Evaluating the Solutions

By reporting the incident, the personal gains are set aside for the betterment of the people

in the society and the institution. The accountant may lose his job at the firm if it is closed down

for the misappropriation of funds upon reporting the case.

Failing to report the incident will protect personal interests as the individuals will keep

their jobs by covering up the accounting mistakes. However, the firm stands to lose everything is

such malpractices are discovered and lead to a jail term for both Dr. Smith and Saul, who is

responsible for the firm’s accounting procedures (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 2015).

D- Decision on the Best Solution

The best solution would be the first one where Saul informs and advises Dr. Smith to

report the accounting mistakes to the relevant authorities. This way, the authorities will be aware

of the mistakes during their pursuit of justice, and it will enable Saul and Dr. Smith to defend the

situation as being a mistake since they had not looked into the details of the firm’s paperwork.

This could save the future of the firm, as they can be able to make the necessary payments and

resume business without risking a jail term or losing their licenses. In addition, they will not have

to live and work with fear of being discovered at any moment during their exercise at the firm

(Lashley, 2016).

D –Defending the Decision

BUSINESS ETHICS HOMEWORK !6

The weakness in this solution is that the firm may be able to manipulate the information

so that it works to its advantage, citing the lack of focus on details by the doctor before he was

able to acquire the assistance from Saul, a qualified accountant. Saul and the doctor may act

unethically to save the firm when reporting the cases (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 2015). However,

reporting the incidence outweighs the effects of continuing the malpractice, where unethical

conduct may continue if the case is not disclosed. The willingness to report the case portrays the

honesty, responsibility, and commitment to their clients, who need to be served with

effectiveness.

BUSINESS ETHICS HOMEWORK !7

References

Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2014). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and

stakeholder management. Nelson Education.

Ferrell, O. C., & Fraedrich, J. (2015). Business ethics: Ethical decision-making & cases. Nelson

Education.

Lashley, C. (2016). Business ethics and sustainability. Research in Hospitality

Management, 6(1).

Pfeiffer, R. S., & Forsberg, R. P. (2012). Ethics on the job: Cases and strategies. Cengage

Learning.