0
Florida International University
GENERAL PHYSICS
LABORATORY 2
MANUAL Edited Fall 2019
1
Florida International University
Department of Physics
Physics Laboratory Manual for Course
PHY 2049L
Contents
Course Syllabus 2
Grading Rubric 4
Estimation of Uncertainties 5
Vernier Caliper 9
Experiments
1. Electrostatics 10
2. Coulomb's Law 13
3. Electric Field and Potential 16
4. Capacitors 21
5. Ohm's Law and Resistance 27
6. Series and Parallel Circuits 33
7. Magnetic Force on Moving Charges 40
8. Magnetic Field of a Solenoid 44
9. Faraday's Law & Lenz's Law 49
10. Reflection & Refraction 53
11. Mirrors, Lenses, Telescope 57
12. Double-Slit Interference 62
2
COURSE SYLLABUS
LAB COORDINATOR
Email: Please use Canvas Inbox
UPDATES
Updates to the lab schedule, make-up policy, etc. may be found on Canvas.
CLASS MEETINGS
• During Fall and Spring Semesters classes start the second week of the semester and end the week prior to the final exam week.
• Students that have missed their own section may attempt to make-up by attending another section during the time the same experiment is conducted (see PantherSoft for
available sections). Admission for make-up is granted by the Instructor on site, no
reservation, no guaranteed seating.
• Students must sign in each class meeting to verify attendance.
ACTIVE LEARNING
One of the important goals of this lab course is to strengthen your understanding of what you
have learned in the classroom. You will be working in groups and encouraged to help each other
by discussing among yourselves any difficulties or misconceptions that occur to you. Apart from
the instructor in charge, student Learning Assistants (LA) will be on hand to encourage
discussion, for example by posing a series of questions.
LAB REPORTS
You will be required to submit a lab report at the end of the class period. The format of the report
is dictated by the experiment. As you work your way through the experiment, following the
procedures in this manual, you will be asked to answer questions, fill in tables of data, sketch
graphs, do straightforward calculations, etc. You should fulfill each of these requirements as you
proceed with the experiment. Any preliminary questions could be answered before coming to the
lab, thereby saving time. This way, you will effectively finish the report as you finish the
experiment. Note that for experiments that require them, blank or partially filled in data tables
are provided on separate perforated pages in this manual at the end of the experiment. You may
carefully tear them out along the perforation and staple them to the rest of your report.
GRADES
• The weekly lab reports and your active participation will determine your grade in the
course. Each week you will receive 30% for active participation and up to 70% for your lab
report.
• A missed assignment or lab will receive a ZERO grade.
• Lab reports are to be handed in before you leave the lab.
• THERE IS NO FINAL EXAM
• The grading system is based on the following scale although your instructor may apply a
"curve" if it is deemed necessary. In addition, “+” and “-“may be assigned in each grade
range when appropriate.
o A: 90-100%
3
o B: 75-90% o C: 60-75% o D: 45-60%
WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVIDE
Calculator with trig. and other math functions including mean and standard deviation.
AT THE END OF CLASS.
1. Disconnect all sensors that you have connected. 2. Report any broken or malfunctioning equipment. 3. Arrange equipment tidily on the bench.
DROPPING THE LECTURE BUT NOT THE LAB
If you find it necessary to drop the lecture course, PHY 2049 or PHY 2054, you do not also have
to drop this lab course, PHY 2049L. However, you will need to see a Physics Advisor and get a
waiver.
4
GRADING RUBRIC
Expectations for a successfully completed experiment and lab report are indicated in the
following rubric. Note that not every scientific ability in the rubric may be tested in every
experiment. Therefore, the graders will determine the maximum number of points attainable for
an experiment (usually 18) and indicate your score as a fraction, e.g 16/18.
Grade Scientific
ability
Missing
(0 pt)
Inadequate
(1 pt)
Needs
improvement
(2 pt)
Adequate
(3 pt)
Attempt to
answer
Preliminary
Questions
No attempt to
answer
Preliminary
Questions
Answers to
Preliminary
Questions
attempted
Able to draw
graphs/diagrams
No graphs or
drawings
provided
Graphs/drawings
poorly drawn with
missing axis labels
or important
information is
wrong or missing
Graphs/drawings
have no wrong
information but a
small amount of
information is
missing
Graphs/drawings
contain no
omissions and are
clearly presented
Able to present
data and tables
No data or
tables
provided
Not all the relevant
data and tables are
provided
Data and tables are
provided but some
information such as
units is missing
Complete set of
data and tables
with all necessary
information
provided
Able to analyze
data
No data
analysis or
analysis
contains
numerous
errors
Data analysis
contains a number
of errors indicating
substantial lack of
understanding
Data analysis is
mostly correct but
some lack of
understanding is
present
Data analysis is
complete with no
errors
Able to answer
Analysis
questions
No Analysis
questions
answered
Less than half the
questions
unanswered or
answered
incorrectly
Less than a quarter
of the questions
unanswered or
answered
incorrectly
All questions
answered
correctly
Able to conduct
experiment as
evidenced by the
quality of results
Little or no
experimental
ability as
evidenced by
poor quality of
results
Results indicate a
marginal level of
experimental ability
Results indicate a
reasonable level of
experimental
ability with room
for improvement
Results indicate a
proficient level of
experimental
ability
5
ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTIES
The purpose of this section is to provide you with the rules for determining the uncertainties in
your experimental results. All measurements have some uncertainty in the results due to the fact
you can never do a perfect experiment. We begin with the rules for estimating uncertainties in
individual measurements, and then show how these uncertainties are to be combined to produce
the uncertainty in the final result.
The “absolute uncertainty” in a measured quantity is expressed in the same units as the quantity
itself. For example, length of table = 1.65 ± 0.05 m or, symbolically, L ± L. This means we are
reasonably confident that the length of the table is between 1.60 and 1.70 m, and 1.65 m is our
best estimate. If L is based on a single measurement, it is often a good rule of thumb to make L
equal to half the smallest division on the measuring scale. In the case of a meter rule, this would
be 0.5 mm. Other considerations, such as a rounded edge to the table, may make us wish to
increase L. For example, in the diagram, the end of the table might be estimated to be to be at
35.3 ± 0.1 cm or even 35.3 ± 0.2 cm.
If the same measurement is repeated several times, the average (mean) value is taken as the most
probable value and the “standard deviation” is used as the absolute uncertainty. Therefore, if the
length of the table is measured 3 times giving values of 1.65, 1.60 and 1.85m, the average value
is
The deviations of the 3 values from the average are -0.05, -0.10 and +0.15m, and the standard
deviation
So now we express the length of the table as 1.7 ± 0.1 m.
Note: Your calculator should be capable of providing the mean and standard deviation
automatically. Excel can also be used to calculate these quantities.
165 160 185
3 170
+ + = m
= sum of squares of deviations
number of measurements
= + +
= 0 05 010 015
3 01
2 2 2. . . . m
6
Generally, it is only necessary to quote an uncertainty to one, or at most two, significant
figures, and the accompanying measurement is rounded off (not truncated) in the same decimal
position.
“Fractional uncertainty” or “percentage uncertainty” is the absolute uncertainty, expressed as a
fraction or percentage of the associated measurement. In the above example, the fractional
uncertainty, L/L is 0.1/1.7 = 0.06, and the percentage uncertainty is 0.06 x 100 = 6%.
Rules for obtaining the uncertainty in a calculated result.
We now need to consider how uncertainties in measured quantities are to be combined to
produce the uncertainty in the final result. There are 2 basic rules:
A) When quantities are added or subtracted, the absolute uncertainty in the result is equal to
the square root of the sum of the squares of the absolute uncertainties in the quantities.
B) When quantities are multiplied or divided, the fractional uncertainty in the result is equal
to the square root of the sum of the squares of the fractional uncertainties in the
quantities.
Examples
1. In calculating a quantity x using the formula x = a + b - c, measurements give
a = 2.1 ± 0.2 kg
b = 1.6 ± 0.1 kg
c = 0.8 ± 0.1 kg
Therefore, x = 2.9 kg
The result is therefore x = 2.9 ± 0.2 kg
2. In calculating a quantity x using the formula x = ab/c, measurements give
a = 0.75 ± 0.01 kg
b = 0.81 ± 0.01 m
c = 0.08 ± 0.02 m
Therefore x = 7.59375 kg (by calculator).
Fractional uncertainty in x,
x
x =
0.01
0.75
2
+ 0.01
0.81
2
+ 0.02
0.08
2
= 0.25
Absolute uncertainty in x, x = 0.25 7.59375
= 2 kg (to one significant figure)
The result is therefore x = 8 ± 2 kg
Note: the value of x has to be rounded in accordance with the value of x. If x had been
calculated to be 0.003 kg, the result would have been x = 7.594 ± 0.003 kg.
3. The following example involves both rule A and rule B.
In calculating a quantity x using the formula x = (a + b)/c, measurements give
Absoluteerror in x x kg, . . . . = + + =0 2 01 01 0 22 2 2
7
a = 0.42 ± 0.01 kg
b = 1.63 ± 0.02 kg
c = 0.0043 ± 0.0004 m3
Therefore x = 476.7 kg/m3
Absolute uncertainty in kg 02.002.001.0 22 =+=+ ba
Fractional uncertainty in a + b = 0.02 / 2.05 = 0.01
Fractional uncertainty in c = 0.0004 / 0.0043 = 0.093
Fractional uncertainty in 094.001.0093.0 22 =+=x
Absolute uncertainty in x, x = 0.094 476.7 = 40 kg/m3 (to one significant figure)
The result is therefore x = 480 ± 40 kg/m3
Note that almost all of the uncertainty here is due to the uncertainty in c. One should therefore
concentrate on improving the accuracy with which c is measured in attempting to decrease the
uncertainty.
Uncertainty in the slope of a graph
Often, one of the quantities used in calculating a final result will be the slope of a graph.
Therefore, we need a rule for determining the uncertainty in the slope. Graphing software such as
Excel can do this for you. Another way to do this is “by hand” as follows: In drawing the best
straight line (see figure on following page),
1. The deviations of the data points from the line should be kept to a minimum. 2. The points should be as evenly distributed as possible on either side of the line. 3. To determine the absolute uncertainty in the slope:
a. Draw a rectangle with the sides parallel to and perpendicular to the best straight line that just encloses all of the points.
b. The slopes of the diagonals of the rectangle are measured to give a maximum slope and a minimum slope.
c. The absolute uncertainty in the slope is given by:
max slope - min slope
2 n , where n
is the number of data points.
8
What has been described above is known as “standard uncertainty theory”. In this system, a
calculated result, accompanied by its uncertainty (the standard deviation s), has the following
properties: There is a 70% probability that the “true value” lies within the ± s of the calculated
value, a 95% probability that it lies within the ± 2s, a 99.7% probability that it lies within ± 3s,
etc. We may therefore state that the “true value” essentially always lies within plus or minus 3
standard deviations from the calculated value. Bear this in mind when comparing your result
with the expected result (when this is known).
Some final words of warning
It is often thought that the uncertainty in a result can be calculated as just the percentage
difference between the result obtained and the expected (textbook) value. This is incorrect. What
is important is whether the expected value lies within the range defined by your result and
uncertainty.
Uncertainties are also sometimes referred to as “errors.” While this language is common practice
among experienced scientists, it conveys the idea that errors were made. However, a good
scientist is going to correct the known errors before completing an experiment and reporting
results. Erroneous results due to poor execution of an experiment are different than uncertain
results due to limits of experimental techniques.
Fig. 1 Graph of extension vs. mass
Mass (kg)
2 3 4 5 6 7
Exten sion(
mm)
4
6
8
10
12
14 Best line
Min. slope Max. slo
pe
9
VERNIER CALIPER
A Vernier scale allows us to measure lengths to a
higher degree of precision than can be obtained with,
say, a millimeter scale. In Fig. 1, a moveable Vernier
scale V is placed next to a millimeter scale M (e.g. on a
meter rule). V is 9mm long and has 10 divisions, each
of length 0.9 mm, so each division on V is shorter than
each division on M by 0.1 mm Fig. 1
Suppose we wish to measure the position on a
meter rule of the right-hand end of an object. V is
positioned as shown in Fig. 2. Clearly the required
reading is somewhere between 24 and 25 mm. To
obtain the fractional part, we note which graduation
on V lines up (or comes closest to lining up) with a
graduation on M. In Fig. 2 it is the 7th, labeled B,
which lines up with C, and the required reading is
therefore 24.7 mm. The reasoning is as follows: Fig. 2
The graduation on V to the left of B is 0.1 mm to the right of the closest graduation on M. The
graduation on V two to the left of B is 0.2 mm to the right of the closest graduation on M, etc.
Therefore the graduation labeled A will be 0.7 mm to the right of the graduation D on scale M.
A tool to measure linear dimensions is the Vernier caliper shown in Fig. 3. It consists of a scale
M graduated in millimeters and attached to a fixed jaw A, and a Vernier scale V on a moveable
jaw B.
Fig.3
Fig. 3
Note that part of the scale M can be seen through an opening in the moveable jaw. When the
jaws are closed, the zero graduations on M and V coincide. The object, C, to be measured is
placed snugly between the jaws by sliding B. The length can then be read from scales M and V.
In Fig. 3, the reading is 2.57 cm. (By counting backwards from the 3 cm graduation, you can see
that the leftmost graduation on V is between 2.5 and 2.6 cm.)
20 mm 30 mm
V
M
A B
CD
Object
1cm0cm 5cm M
A B
C
3
V
cm
B
30 mm 40 mm
V
M
10
Lab 1. Electrostatics
Electric charge, like mass, is a fundamental property of the particles that make up matter. However, unlike mass, charge comes in two forms that we label positive (e.g. the charge of a proton) and negative (e.g. the charge of an electron). Normal matter is made up of "neutral" atoms having equal numbers of protons and electrons but, for example, can become negatively charged by gaining electrons, or positively charged by losing electrons. Charged objects of the same sign repel each other whereas those of opposite sign attract each other. In the first part of this experiment, an "electroscope" will be used to demonstrate the existence of the two types of charge and a few of their basic properties. In the second part, the attractive and repulsive forces that charges can exert on each other will be investigated. In the third part, a "Faraday pail" and charge sensor will be used to determine the sign of the charge resulting from rubbing objects together. OBJECTIVES
Demonstrate that a material can acquire a net charge by rubbing it with a dissimilar material.
Demonstrate that either of the two types of charge may be acquired, depending on the material, and demonstrate the forces that charges exert on each other.
Demonstrate that charge can be either transferred to an object or "induced" on an object.
Determine the signs of the charges acquired by rubbing two dissimilar materials together.
MATERIALS
various rods and rubbing cloths Faraday pail and charge sensor electroscope charge separators swivel Labquest Mini
connecting wires computer
PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS
1. If something is "charged," what does that mean?
2. If something is "neutral," what does that mean"
3. What happens if you have two positively charged objects near each other?
4. What happens if you have a positively charged object near a negatively charged one?
PROCEDURE
Part I Demonstrations with the electroscope
The electroscope, shown in Fig. 1, consists of a metal conducting rod with a
metal ball at the upper end and a pair of light, hinged, conducting leaves at
the lower end. The rod is insulated from the electroscope’s metal case by
an insulating stopper. If both leaves acquire either a net positive charge or
a net negative charge, they will separate due to the repulsive forces that the
leaves exert on each other. Fig. 1 shows the situation when the ball, rod,
and leaves have acquired positive charge. Figure 1