The rise and fall of four loko

Please follow all directions, i have uploaded files for "The Rise and Fall of Four Loko" and "Rules about Footnotes" , "Advice on how to write a good philosophy paper" ,i will upload pictures of the reading of The Rise and Fall of Four Loko, and "how to construct a moral argument". I will also upload the INSTRUCTIONS for this assigment.*PLEASE READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS ALL THE WAY THROUGH TO MAKE SURE YOU HAVEN’T MISSED ANY DETAILS!* Your essay should consist in total of approximately three double-spaced pages in 14-point font, with no more than one-inch margins. (Not three pages per question, but three pages in total.) Then study the third Canvas module, entitled, “Advice About How to Write a Good Philosophy Paper”. Make sure you are aware of the rules about how to format your paper and how to cite sources in your essay. They are in the section entitled, “Rules about Footnotes”. Last but not least, re-read chapter how to construct a Moral argument. Once you’ve done all this, you’re ready to start working on your essay. Begin by reading the material from section 6-6 of Chapter 6 that is entitled, “Case 6.5 The Rise and Fall of Four Loko”. Making online notes for yourself as you go along will help you understand and retain the material better. Organize your essay into three sections as follows. Please number and label each section and subsection. As you can see, the questions are based on the “Discussion Questions” found at the end of Case 6.5. Section 1. Section 1 should be about one-half to one pages in length in toto. Sub-section 1a. On the basis of your own research, answer the following four questions about what Four Loko is doing today. Answer each question in its own paragraph. • What drinks is Four Loko marketing today? • What is their marketing strategy? • How are the drinks they are marketing today different from or the same as the drinks that got them in trouble in 2010? • Has their marketing changed at all? If so, how? In this sub-section, you are required to draw on outside research you have done either through Questia or from other sources that you judge to be “credible